At a Glance
Average Property Price - TS10
£176,966
7
National percentile
Average Monthly Rent - TS
£668
5
National percentile
Average Net Household Income - TS10
£31,935
14
National percentile
Flat / Maisonette Yield - TS
6.6%
94
National percentile
10-Year Annualised Price Growth - TS10
3.1%
31
National percentile
10-Year Annualised Rent Growth - TS
2.9%
4
National percentile
Property Price & Volume Trends
The average property price in TS10 is £177,000, placing it among the least expensive districts nationally. Over the past decade, prices have grown at 3.1% annually—below the national average rate. Transaction activity has slowed noticeably; the latest year saw 393 sales against a ten-year average of 542, suggesting a tightening market.
Rent & Yield Trends
Average monthly rent in the broader TS postcode area stands at £668, well below the national average. Rental growth over ten years has been subdued at 2.9% annually, among the slowest nationally. The flat yield has improved to 6.6% from a ten-year average of 5.8%, reflecting a strengthening income return for landlords despite modest rental growth.
Income & Affordability Trends
Average household income here is £31,935, considerably below the national average. The price-to-income ratio of 5.1x has edged up slightly since 2016 (5.0x), indicating that purchasing power relative to prices has weakened modestly. Rental affordability has improved: the rent-to-income ratio has fallen from 21.9% to 20.7%, suggesting rents are consuming a smaller share of household income.
Resident Demographic Profile
The population skews notably older, with those aged 50–64 representing 22.2% (above the 19.8% national average) and those 65+ at 21.5% (above 19.6% nationally). The working-age population is correspondingly thinner, particularly in the 16–24 bracket at 9.3% versus 11.0% nationally. Employment is marked by an unusually high concentration in caring professions at 13.9% against the national 9.2%, and trades workers are also overrepresented at 11.6% compared to 10.5% nationally; conversely, professional roles are underrepresented at 14.8% versus 20.5%.